首页> 外文OA文献 >Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil followed by randomization to two cisplatin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (CONDOR study) (Dutch Head and Neck Society 08-01): A randomized phase II study
【2h】

Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil followed by randomization to two cisplatin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (CONDOR study) (Dutch Head and Neck Society 08-01): A randomized phase II study

机译:多西他赛/顺铂/ 5-氟尿嘧啶诱导化疗,然后随机分配至局部晚期头颈部癌患者的两种基于顺铂的同时放化疗方案(CONDOR研究)(荷兰头颈学会08-01):II期随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To study the feasibility of induction chemotherapy added to concomitant cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). LAHNC patients were treated with 4 courses of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by randomization to either cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) with conventional radiotherapy (cis100 + RT) or cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) weekly with accelerated radiotherapy (cis40 + ART). Primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as receiving ≥ 90% of the scheduled total radiation dose. Based on power analysis 70 patients were needed. 65 patients were enrolled. The data safety monitoring board advised to prematurely terminate the study, because only 22% and 41% (32% in total) of the patients treated with cis100 + RT (n = 27) and cis40 + ART (n = 29) could receive the planned dose cisplatin during CRT, respectively, even though the primary endpoint was reached. Most common grade 3-4 toxicity was febrile neutropenia (18%) during TPF and dehydration (26% vs 14%), dysphagia (26% vs 24%) and mucositis (22% vs 57%) during cis100 + RT and cis40 + ART, respectively. For the patients treated with cis100 + RT and cis40 + ART, two years progression free survival and overall survival were 70% and 78% versus 72% and 79%, respectively. After TPF induction chemotherapy, cisplatin-containing CRT is not feasible in LAHNC patients, because the total planned cisplatin dose could only be administered in 32% of the patients due to toxicity. However, all but 2 patients received more than 90% of the planned radiotherapy. Clinical Trials Information: NCT00774319
机译:为了研究在局部晚期头颈癌(LAHNC)患者中,在基于顺铂的放化疗同时进行诱导化疗的可行性。 LAHNC患者每周接受4疗程的多西他赛/顺铂/ 5-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)治疗,然后随机分配至常规放疗(cis100 + RT)或顺铂40 mg / m(2)的顺铂100 mg / m(2),每周一次。加速放疗(cis40 + ART)。主要终点是可行的,定义为接受≥计划总放射剂量的90%。根据功效分析,需要70名患者。招募了65位患者。数据安全监视委员会建议过早终止研究,因为接受cis100 + RT(n = 27)和cis40 + ART(n = 29)治疗的患者中只有22%和41%(总计32%)可以接受该治疗。即使达到了主要终点,在CRT期间仍计划使用顺铂的剂量。最常见的3-4级毒性是在TP100和RT和cis40 +期间发生TPF和脱水期间的发热性中性粒细胞减少(18%)(26%vs 14%),吞咽困难(26%vs 24%)和粘膜炎(22%vs 57%)。 ART。对于接受cis100 + RT和cis40 + ART治疗的患者,两年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为70%和78%,而72%和79%。经过TPF诱导化疗后,在LAHNC患者中,含顺铂的CRT是不可行的,因为由于毒性,计划中的顺铂总剂量只能用于32%的患者。但是,除2名患者外,所有患者均接受了计划放射治疗的90%以上。临床试验信息:NCT00774319

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号